A father allegedly used his child’s TikTok account to arrange a confrontation after the family discovered evidence of sexual abuse.

Franklin County Sheriff’s Office
An Ohio dad shooting case has raised difficult questions about child protection, vigilantism and what happens when a devastated family takes justice into its own hands.
Police said 31-year-old Malik Chandler allegedly posed as his 11-year-old daughter on TikTok and used her account to persuade a man accused of sexually assaulting her to return to the family’s Grove City home.
When the man arrived, Chandler allegedly shot him twice.
Both men now face separate felony cases. Chandler is charged with felonious assault, while 20-year-old Diego Montoya Gonzalez has been accused of rape and possessing or creating sexually oriented material involving children.
The accusations against both defendants remain allegations unless proven in court.
Mother Reportedly Found Video on Child’s Phone
According to court records and local news reports, the case began after the child’s mother found a video on her daughter’s cellphone that appeared to show Gonzalez sexually assaulting the girl inside the family’s home.
Authorities said the discovery was made less than a day before the July shooting.
Investigators allege Chandler then communicated with Gonzalez through his daughter’s TikTok account while pretending to be the child. The messages reportedly persuaded Gonzalez to return to the family’s home on Parlin Drive in Grove City, a suburb of Columbus.
Police were called to the property shortly after 6 p.m. When officers arrived, they found Gonzalez sitting in a chair with two gunshot wounds, according to local reports.
He was taken to Grant Medical Center for treatment. His condition following hospitalization was not immediately clear in the available court and news reports.
Father Said He Planned to Detain the Man
Investigators said Chandler told police that he planned to confront Gonzalez, beat him and hold him until officers arrived.
Chandler reportedly claimed he fired because he believed Gonzalez was reaching toward his pocket for a weapon.
The available reports did not confirm that police recovered a weapon from Gonzalez at the scene. That part of Chandler’s account will likely be examined as the criminal case moves forward.
Chandler was arrested and charged with felonious assault. His bond was reportedly set at $100,000.
The legal question is not whether a parent would feel anger after discovering evidence that a child had been abused. That reaction is easy to understand.
The question for the court is whether Chandler faced an immediate threat when he fired or whether he deliberately created a confrontation that led to violence.
Gonzalez Arrested After Police Investigation
Grove City police arrested Gonzalez on July 22 with help from a Strategic Response Team, according to local reports.
Police said he initially ran from officers before being taken into custody.
A Franklin County grand jury later indicted Gonzalez on several serious charges, including:
- Two counts of rape
- Five counts involving sexually oriented material
- One count of obstructing official business
Prosecutors alleged that investigators found multiple videos involving the sexual abuse of children on Gonzalez’s phone. One video reportedly involved an infant or toddler.
Because those allegations involve pending criminal charges, they have not been established as facts at trial.
Gonzalez reportedly received a $20,000 recognizance bond and a separate $50,000 cash bond. If released, he was ordered to have no contact with the child or her family and to avoid internet use except when required for work.
Two Criminal Cases, Two Different Questions
The case has generated strong reactions because it involves two deeply emotional issues: the alleged sexual assault of a child and a parent accused of responding with gunfire.
The criminal cases must be considered separately.
The Case Against Gonzalez
Prosecutors must prove that Gonzalez committed the alleged sexual assault and child-exploitation offenses.
Evidence may include:
- Video recovered from electronic devices
- Messages exchanged through social media
- Digital account records
- Witness statements
- Medical or forensic evidence
- Testimony presented under protections designed for child victims
The Case Against Chandler
Prosecutors must separately prove that Chandler knowingly caused serious physical harm by shooting Gonzalez.
Chandler’s defense could argue that he believed Gonzalez was reaching for a gun and that he fired to protect himself or others.
However, prosecutors may argue that Chandler arranged the encounter and intended to assault or restrain Gonzalez before police became involved.
Those competing claims will have to be tested through evidence, not social-media opinion.
Why Vigilante Justice Creates Serious Risks
Parents have a basic duty to protect their children. But arranging a private confrontation with a suspected offender can place the child, the family, neighbors and responding officers in greater danger.
A confrontation can also complicate the original investigation by:
- Creating new criminal charges.
- Damaging or destroying digital evidence.
- Giving a defense attorney grounds to challenge witness accounts.
- Exposing family members to retaliation.
- Increasing the possibility that an innocent person could be harmed.
- Turning a child-abuse investigation into a shooting investigation.
The justice system does not always move as quickly as frightened families want. Victims and parents may also fear that authorities will not take them seriously.
Those concerns deserve attention. Yet violence can weaken the very case a family is trying to build.
Social Media Played a Central Role
TikTok was allegedly used both as a communication tool and as part of the father’s plan to bring Gonzalez back to the home.
The case is another warning that children’s online conversations can quickly move into the physical world.
Parents and guardians should regularly discuss online safety without making children feel blamed or punished for reporting troubling behavior.
Warning signs may include:
- Secret accounts or disappearing messages
- Conversations with unknown adults
- Requests for photographs or videos
- Gifts, money or promises of special treatment
- Pressure to hide a relationship
- Sudden fear, withdrawal or changes in behavior
- An adult asking a child to meet privately
Children should be reminded that they will not be punished for reporting uncomfortable messages, threats or inappropriate contact.
What Families Should Do After Suspected Abuse
When a parent finds possible evidence of child sexual abuse, the priority should be the child’s immediate safety and the preservation of evidence.
Parents should avoid confronting the suspected offender or posting accusations online.
Instead, they should:
- Move the child to a safe location.
- Contact law enforcement.
- Preserve the phone, tablet or computer in its current condition.
- Avoid deleting messages, images or accounts.
- Do not repeatedly question the child.
- Seek medical care when appropriate.
- Contact a child advocacy center for trauma-informed assistance.
Repeated questioning can overwhelm a child and may affect how statements are later presented in court. Trained forensic interviewers are prepared to speak with children in a careful, age-appropriate manner.
Public Sympathy Does Not Decide Criminal Responsibility
Many people may sympathize with a parent who believes someone harmed his child. Others may see the alleged shooting as a dangerous act of revenge.
Both reactions are understandable, but neither determines guilt.
Criminal courts must evaluate intent, evidence, self-defense claims and the circumstances immediately surrounding the shooting.
Gonzalez is entitled to the presumption of innocence on the rape and child-exploitation charges. Chandler has the same right regarding the felonious-assault charge.
That legal principle does not minimize the seriousness of the allegations. It protects the integrity of the process for victims, defendants and the public.
Protect the Child and Preserve the Case
The Ohio dad shooting case is disturbing on every level.
A child was allegedly sexually assaulted. A man was shot. A father and the accused attacker are now both defendants in separate criminal proceedings.
The strongest response to suspected child abuse is one that protects the child while preserving evidence and allowing trained investigators to act.
Families who discover possible abuse should contact police immediately, secure electronic devices and seek help from medical professionals or a child advocacy center. They should not attempt to conduct their own arrest, interrogation or punishment.
Anger may be natural. Accountability must still come through a process that protects the child and establishes the truth.
Sources: New York Post and WSYX/ABC 6 reporting, along with cited court and police information.




